Integrating the Arts Essay Thesis Example For Students

Integrating the Arts Essay Thesis As reforms have been implemented and assessed, educational leaders have begun to appear to be ready to entertain new and broader definitions of vat constitutes intelligence and cognition and what contributes to their development in children. Many who are actively involved in educational reform movements have called for a deduction in their systems reliance on standardized tests, written examinations, and other traditional assessment strategies as the most viable way to measure such complex educational outcomes as knowledge and cognitive growth in an individual. When broader notions of what the human intellect comprises are the design of the curriculum, the practice of teaching, and the training and retraining of teachers and school administrators must also be examined. Opportunities to increase the role the arts play in educating our youth then become apparent. If these opportunities are to be realized, we deed new approaches and strategies. Change becomes the order of the day. Educators have encapsulated their approaches by coining such catch phrases as interdisciplinary curriculum, infusing the arts, and integrating the curriculum, The Arts and General Education The general educational curriculum, as we know it, tends to be fragmented and compartmentalized, and, until now, transepts to develop significant linkages from one subject area to another have been rare. Therefore, schooling can be seen, at some levels, more as a series of discrete learning experiences than as a synthesis f related learning from a wide variety of academic disciplines. The issues we face as educators and, more specifically, as art(s) educators, are more varied and perhaps more critical that any issues art(s) educators have had to face in our countrys history. Increasing levels Of cultural diversity, socioeconomic disparity, and gender issues place many of our students in the at risk (of dropping out) category in terms Of public education. Often wonder how many Of our students have dropped out mentally, even though they still attend school. There can be little doubt that many Of the issues that currently face art(s) education also halogen the entire educational system. Interestingly enough. These issues often seem almost diametrically opposed to or mutually exclusive of each other, and, as yet, there seem to be no clear answers. The most pressing of these issues involves the increasing level of cultural diversity exhibited by LIST. Dents. This is followed closely by such related issues as designing curricula that are gender neutral; deciding whether a national curriculum is desirable, let alone achievable, and creating and implementing culturally unbiased assessment measures that provide an accurate measure to academic achievement. With ACH passing day, our nation becomes more culturally diverse, the verbal and visual languages spoken in our schools multiply, and the cultural values of our students become more and more disparate. The image of the United States as a vast cultural melting pot has yielded to a truer analogue-that of the United States as a cultural tossed salad. Todays teachers face huge educational problems when they attempt to design experiences that allow our students to cherish and build upon the cultural values of their own heritage while learning tolerance for the values of others and then to develop the shared beliefs that re necessary for Our nation to maintain its purpose and identity. Even achieving gender equitystructuring educational experiences to accommodate the learning styles Of both males and females, and turning away from educational stereotypes that limit the aspirations of students because of their genderseems almost impossible for the traditional school system to address successfully. In the arts, the move from one era, modernism, to the next set of artistic constructs and beliefs, postmodernism, is also causing many of us to restructure what we teach and how we seek to teach it. Ethical issues relating to the role that teachers would play in the emotional and moral development of their students can be contrasted with issues of academic freedom revolving around censorship. A major concern is to find ways to balance programmatic content that may be seen as controversial, or even radial, with values that may, or may not, he held by a majority of ones community members. In attempts to address the issues and concerns mentioned above, two separate approaches have emerged as possible vehicles tort making the arts an equal partner in general education. While these approaches share the goal of strengthening the role the arts play in making schooling more relevant to our children, they differ drastically in how this goal is realized. These strategies can be labeled the interdisciplinary-arts approach and the integrating-the-arts approach. The Interdisciplinary-Arts Approach The interdisciplinary-arts approach crosses traditional subject matter boundaries by combining them. It requires the creation of a new breed of teachera renaissance teachertrained to create and deliver interdisciplinary learning experiences in multiple art forms to children. This, according the Lengthener, marks the emergence of what could become a new paradigm for teacher reparation in arts education. On the surface, the creation off viable cadre of interdisciplinary arts teachers seems like an important way to infuse the arts into education. After all, as an forms, dance, art, music, and theatre share many common concerns. Elementary school teachers, Who teach in self-contained classrooms, are expected to prepare lessons and teach up to thirteen different subjects each day. Couldnt we create their equivalent-a group Of generalist arts teachers who have the skills and knowledge to share the arts with students in an interdisciplinary fashion? While the idea of creating linkages between ND among the arts is important, the notion of training large numbers of interdisciplinary teachers who can teach the arts as one unified, holistic subject in our schools, or of training elementary generalists to attempt this mission, is problematic for several important reasons. Chief among these reasons is the role of the arts teacher. This approach reverses most, if not all, of the reforms we have undertaken in education during the last twelve years. Much to the reform movement in education has been fueled by the conclusions of the Holmes Group, the Carnegie Forum on Education and the Economy, the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, the College Entrance Examination Board, and upcoming reports and recommendations by the National Board of Professional Teaching Standards. LS] In the arts, reform also has been stimulated by publications from working groups comprised of members of the professional arts education associations and the Getty Center for Education in the Arts and by the recent publication of parallel national standards for the teaching of each of the Without exception, each Of the major reports coming from these independent groups calls for more subject-matter knowledge on the part of teachers. In fact, the Holmes Report and A Nation Prepared: Teachers for the 21st Century from the Carnegie Foundation have helped spawn a proliferation of five- year programs in teacher education that are predicated on allowing prospective teachers to attain a bachelors degree in a specialized subject area before they spend a fifth year acquiring the pedagogical skills they need to communicate that knowledge in their classrooms. 171 In essence, the thrust of these and many other calls for reform lies in intensifying rather than diluting the content of education by strengthening and adding focus to the subject area knowledge or expertise of teachers. While each of us can think of examples of individuals who possess proclivities in more than one art form, most of those in the arts find that their talents lie in one specific art form, and indeed may lie in one medium or category of that art form, To expect large numbers of individuals to function as multivalent arts teachers who can sing dance, play instruments, read music, choreograph dances, conduct, draw, paint, sculpt, and delve into interactive media is simply beyond the scope of human capability. The Persian Empire EssayIn Other words, as a pragmatist, propose change that, because minimizes increases in costs, is acceptable to education decision makers not only during a period Of educational reform, when funding for such initiatives is temporarily available, but also during those long years between periods Of reform. First, this integrated arts program must be based on a team-teaching approach that utilizes the expertise of trained pacifists in art, music, dance, and theatre education. Currently, middle schools in virtually all states employ specialists in art, music, and physical education. Many physical education majors have strong backgrounds in movement or dance, At some point in the not-too-distant future, teacher certification in dance may become more common. But until then, we should seek to make use of the expertise currently offered by our physical education instructors. Theatre, also, is not adequately represented at the elementary and middle school levels, but until there are more theatre specialists, creative writing could be substituted or theatre, particularly it significant time is spent in the class studying, writing and performing plays. How would such a program be organized? Instead of attending art classes every day for six to nine weeks and then switching to music every day for six to nine weeks, then to theatre, and finally to dance, block scheduling students would allow them to attend art, music, dance, and theatre for a double period on four successive days each week of an entire semester and then to meet together with all four arts teachers in a large group on the fifth day of the cycle for the semester (see table I). As you can see, the total length Of the program remains the sameone semester-and the staffing, with the exception Of theatre or creative writing, is also the same. The major differences lie in the team-teaching approach, which allows the arts teachers to plan together and reinforce the students learning experiences in the arts program. For the first time in the history of arts education, opportunities for developing the abilities to respond, produce or perform, appreciate, value, and create a cultural/historical context for all the arts become attainable. The content for the integrated arts aerogram would be drawn from the four artistic disciplines and sequenced so that the themes, concepts, styles, cultures, and periods covered in each of the visual arts would also be covered and reinforced in the others. The cultural, critical, social, historical, and aesthetic implications of such in-depth study are enormous compared to the piecemeal way in which we currently cover the arts. At present, we can only guess at how much more powerful and efficient our arts programs would be. But the thought to middle school students studying the works, mastering the techniques, and examining the aesthetic beliefs of he impressionist painters while listening to and performing the music that was being played, seeing and dancing the ballets and folk dances that were being performed, and reading and performing excerpts from the literature and theatre of Western Europe at that time is more than a bit enticing. Indeed, how much more relevant would schooling become if an equal amount of time and effort was spent in exploring the culture of native Americans or African Americans through an in-depth examination of their art works, while listening to and performing the music they played, seeing and dancing the tribal and folk dances that ere part of the everyday lives of their ancestors, and reading and performing excerpts from the Oral histories that have been passed down from generation to generation by members of these or many other American and non-western cultures? Arts programs in our schools hue been based on gifted and talented models of education. Traditionally, as children passed through our educational system, eve have tended to encourage those Who could produce or perform and discourage those who appeared to be less physically or overtly dexterous. In short, we have tended to concentrate on developing the gifts of a talented minority rather than creating generations of connoisseurs of the arts. Our programs have suffered accordingly. Integrating the arts with each other could well begin to reverse this trend by providing multiple opportunities for achieving success while studying the arts. How many new avenues for success in studying the arts could be uncovered in addition to producing or performing is an open question that begs to be investigated. Finally, you may think that my vision tort an integrated arts program is overly broad, lacking clarity or definition, In part, must agree. These musings are meant to stimulate, not prescribe. There is no en right way to achieve the kinds of aims have placed before you in this brief article. One cannot and should not attempt to teacher-proof a curriculum by creating a curricular cookbook bursting with cant-fail teaching recipes. Teachers must tailor their curricular, and their pedagogical, efforts to meet the needs of their students, and the approach outlined here is an attempt to encourage the kind of unified thinking and curricular bridge building that we so desperately need in our educational system. If we can integrate the arts with each other, we can accomplish two vital goals. We can once again serve as a model for the est.. Of the curriculum (as we are currently doing in the areas Of evaluation and assessment), and we can make it possible for arts educators to participate significantly in the restructuring Of general education With the arts at its core. Integrating the Arts with the Rest of the Curriculum Historically, eve have failed to carve out a niche for the arts in education that makes us equal partners in the educational process. Perhaps the leap from frill to essential, from fluff to requirement, was simply too great a vault for any field to make. However, once the arts have been successfully integrated with each other, here is a very real possibility that they may be able to document their academic relevance and intellectual discipline to prove that they merit full partnership in the educational system. The question for us as individual teachers of the arts and as teachers in related fields, therefore, is not simply, How do we get better at doing what we do? Rather, we should ask, What must we do to move our titles into the educational mainstream? As efforts to refine and strengthen the general school curriculum continue, infusing the arts into general education is a goal we must accomplish. This goal, however, will not be realized through the creation of new breed of interdisciplinary arts teachers who, fear, could never hope to do justice to the art forms they seek to teach A more reasoned approach to making the arts more central to education is to eliminate the isolation that arts teachers encounter in their teaching situation and to make it possible for arts teachers to work together, to exchange ideas, and to plan in teams as we look to guarantee the future of the arts in educational] The goal of integrating the arts with each other and then with general education certainly merits serious exploration.